Navigationshilfe:
| Sitemap | | |||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||
| Themen | Aktivitäten | Über uns | Paulo Freire | | en | fr | pt | es | | ||||||||
The world is in upheaval. We have
attempted to better understand these changes in 3 development conferences. The
First Austrian Development Conference 2001 in
The Second Austrian Development Conference 2003 in Graz dealt with the phenomenon of globalization. Especially the understanding of global change stood in the foreground. At the same time, the desire to find alternatives was noticeable. The role of ownership in the globalized world was the theme of the Third Development Conference in Linz 2005 during which specific models were discussed to organize and understand ownership differently than through the familiar polarity of “private” and “public”. Concepts of a “solidarity economy” were discussed just as well as approaches of “possession”, “property” and “ownership”. Visions are essential starting
points for work in development cooperation, as well as in the anti-corporate
movement. Utopias are assigned an important part, giving politics in general,
development politics in particular, a direction. The development conference
perceives itself as a space in which to discuss and exchange such visions and
utopias. “Growth – Environment – Development” Depoliticisation conveys itself, among other things, in the fragmentation in the fields of politics. Economic policy, environment policy and development policy are seen as separate fields, although their entanglement is quite obvious. These connections have once again become very clear through the intensified debates on climate protection. At the same time, contradictions are becoming more evident. The current international discourse on topics of environment and development reflects this fragmentation: The Brundtland-Report of 1987 was followed by the UN-Conference in Rio 1992, furthermore the Rio+5 and the Rio+10, as well as the meeting in Johannesburg. One noticeable fact is that growth was originally challenged as a goal of development policy. Over time, various forms of growth were distinguished: “Qualitative growth” was separated from “quantitative growth”. Theories of subsistence emerged as a radical criticism of growth concepts; however, the critical impetus has largely disappeared from the debate, so that today growth is not even challenged in the alternative discourse. The renaissance of a somewhat unreflected concept of growth is ubiquitous throughout the entire ideological spectrum. Left-wing as well as right-wing governments share this approach. On the other hand, many feel that the subsistence theory’s approaches don’t provide a convincing way out of the dilemma, and have come under strong criticism, because their realization would hardly lead to an amelioration of living standards. Some of the alternative approaches are seen as myths. Today, “sustainable development” focuses on economic development; solutions are sought after in the trade of emission certificates, instead of in the alteration of the relations of production. It seems necessary to re-think the concept of growth. Developments in the field of intellectual property rights also need to be discussed in this context. The marketing and commodification of common land on a global scale, also in the field of water supply, raises many questions. Following questions can be generated from the area of tension “growth vs. sustainability”: Under which circumstances is growth (not) sensible? Which actors have access to which resources? Which ecological allocation conflicts are carried out? Taking the example of climate protection: Who has caused which environmental burdens and who will pay the costs for the repair thereof? Who has which pollution rights? Who carries the ecological consequences of the production of biofuel? Basically, it is about a consolidation of various fields of politics. An integrated concept of development would have to combine the goal of poverty reduction with climate protection and a distribution-oriented economic policy. Criticism of wealth could not be missing, nor could a reflection of growth criticism and of societal relations to nature. Finally, the possibilities of multilateral approaches (global governance) for the prevention and solution of conflicts arising from climate change and environmental damage should be discussed. Innsbruck The conference will be held mainly in german language. Some of the plenary speeches will be held in english, and two of the forums will be in english language. The 4th Austrian Conference on Development will take place in Innsbruck from Friday, 14th of November, to Sunday, 16th of November 2008. It will essentially deal with questions related to economic growth, development and environmental consequences. Under which premises does economic growth make sense? How much growth can environment bear? The Conference on Development wishes to link and produce knowledge to enable an integrated perception of development that recognizes the economic logic of growth and the natural scientific logic of environment as part of the same dynamic of world development. Find a more detailed description of the conference's theoretical background and objectives here: Twofold Dialogue - On the didactics of the 4th Austrian Conference on Development.
Who will attend the conference? The conference addresses experts from the developmental as well as the environmental sector, practitioners as well as theoreticians, who want to look beyond their own disciplines, promote exchange and create new alliances. It also aims at all persons interested in development politics. Concretely, participants will be… …people, who work in development organisations, in the public sector and in the private / NGO / church sector. …people, who belong to organisations of the environmental sector, or to other social organisations. …people, who are interested in questions of development politics: students from different universities, teachers, activists … …opinion leaders in media and politicians. Number of participants: approx. 200 - 300.
What do we aim at with this conference? 1. To open new spaces for networking. 2. To provide free space for critical thinking, to reflect about the contradictions between the individual and the structures. 3. To develop a new concept of development that gives answers also to the contradictions of the mainstream system. For doing so, it is necessary to promote knowledge for better orientation in our confusing times, but also to develop political visions.
Outline of the programme
|
|
||||||||
|
Home | Impressum | Sitemap | Kontakt © Paulo Freire Zentrum |
|||||||||